What is a turbo roundabout?
This article is also available here in Spanish.

What is a turbo roundabout?

My list

Author | Lucía Burbano

In their goal of improving traffic flow and safety, cities continue to seek and implement mobility solutions. One of the most distinctive is the turbo roundabout, developed in the Netherlands in the 1990s and now adopted by many other countries and cities for its positive impact on urban design.

How is a roundabout different from a turbo roundabout?

In 1996, L.G.H. Fortuijn, a professor in the Department of Transport and Planning at the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences of Delft University of Technology, had a vision: to improve the standard multi-lane roundabout with a design that would enhance traffic flow and reduce the risk of collisions at these intersections.

The first turbo roundabout was built in the Netherlands in 2000, and its success was such that the country now has nearly 300 of them, along with national guidelines that standardize this innovation in civil engineering and urban planning. In fact, since then, the country no longer allows the construction of simple or multi-lane roundabouts.

The key difference is that, unlike a traditional roundabout, a turbo roundabout requires drivers to choose their entry lane in advance according to the exit they intend to take, as lane dividers prevent last-minute changes. The lanes in turbo roundabouts are designed in a spiral or circular pattern to make traffic safer and smoother, while also improving flow.

This is a turbo roundabout

turbo roundabout

 

A turbo roundabout is designed with a spiral layout and physically separated lanes, using raised barriers that keep drivers from changing lanes inside the roundabout, guiding them directly to their exit.

This civil engineering project must consider the needs of pedestrians and cyclists, as well as trucks and motorcycles.

Its design includes the following elements, which help reduce speed and increase separation between users, enhancing safety:

  • Spiral design that guides traffic in a continuous flow without weaving.
  • Radial entry alignment: ensures a steady transition as drivers move from the circulating lane to the spiral path.
  • Mountable aprons: widened sections along the inner edge of the central island or at the outer corners of the intersection that provide additional maneuvering space for large vehicles such as trucks and buses.

Advantages of a turbo roundabout vs. a traditional roundabout

In practical terms, turbo roundabouts are more straightforward than traditional ones, as they demand fewer choices from drivers, improving traffic flow and boosting the number of vehicles that can move through.

That said, drivers must pay attention to signage before entering a turbo roundabout to position themselves in the correct lane and ensure they can take the proper exit.

Turbo roundabouts also stand out for other reasons.

They offer greater flow

A quick assessment model indicates that the capacity of a turbo roundabout is 25% to 35% higher than that of a standard two-lane roundabout. This is thanks to its guided lanes, which prevent lane changes and make the roundabout more efficient by reducing conflict points and eliminating interior yield signs, allowing for a more consistent speed.

They reduce fatal accidents

From their early implementation, between the late 1990s and 2015, turbo roundabouts proved to be life-saving, reducing fatal accidents by at least 50%.

They also reduce accidents and traffic incidents

Studies and experiments show that traffic accidents are reduced by 72% in turbo roundabouts compared to traditional multi-lane roundabouts.

They produce fewer emissions

According to a study conducted in the Czech Republic, CO2 emissions from vehicles in conventional roundabouts are up to 53.62% higher than in turbo roundabouts, making them important allies in decarbonization efforts, particularly in cities expanding their periphery.

Images | Jeroen Komen (CC BY-SA 2.0), Tarquinius89 (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Related Content

Recommended profiles for you

PC
Pestel christine
OKEENEA
x
TP
Tushar Pal
Protonshub Technologies
CTO
RD
Ruslana Dovzhyk
TechNovator
Co-founder
MB
Martim Bustorff
Via Verde
Business Developer
DH
David Huguet
Deloitte
Mobility Manager Deloitte
MM
Maximilian Meissner
PricewaterhouseCoopers GmbH WPG
Manager
TJ
Tomer Jakov
Drive Group (Derech Eretz)
VP of business development and innovation
SR
Soren Ragard
Milestone Systems
SV
Schneider Volker
ims-consult GmbH & Co.KG
CEO
MU
Manuel Ulloa
JB
Jaume Barcelo
PTV Group
Strategic Advisor on Transport Models
PR
pilar ramirez
ronda
NL
Nayar Adolfo Lugo Chacón
Altran Innovación
Complete Vehicle Development Unit Manager
JH
Jørgen G Hopland
Stavanger Municipality
Advisor on mobility, data, and technology, with an academic background in sociology and STS
SM
Sean McDonagh
KERB
SR
Sanjana Ravi
InSell GmbH
I am an Intern in the company working on developing future concepts for smart mobility.
RO
Ricardo Oliveira
Laboratory of Active Living - Rio de Janeiro State University
Associated Professor/Researcher
GH
Guillermo Javier Hernández M
GRON
Partner
MV
Milan Veternik
OMS Intelligence Solutions
Head od Smart Mobility
MH
Mathis Heller
Mathis Heller Design
Owner and Design Director

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.