Which cities are paving the way to proper waste-to-energy generation
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Which cities are paving the way to proper waste-to-energy generation

My list

Author | M. Martínez Euklidiadas

Companies and people generate vast amounts of waste. As the population becomes urbanized, this waste originates in cities, and the favorite destination are landfill sites, where the waste decomposes, generating methane or contaminating water sources.

But there are two exceptions: recyclable materials, which are transformed in the circuit to become raw materials for other processes, and waste that can be incinerated to obtain energy, a process called waste to energy conversion.

The challenge of waste to energy conversion

Despite seeming counterintuitive, waste from landfills that generate methane (CH4), when burned, will only generate CO2, a greenhouse gas with 56 times less global warming potential (GWP, IPCC).

The basic energy recovery process consists of burning waste to heat water for use as heating, or sending its steam to a turbine to obtain a negligible fraction of the energy that it cost to generate the waste. It is not efficient, but at least it is less polluting than the landfill site.

Innovations in the sustainable conversion of waste into energy

Although waste is not only burned. Relatively new innovations and processes like those below, have increased the efficiency of energy recovery systems:

  • Thermal gasification. Technology that converts any carbon-based material into combustible gas.
  • Waste pyrolysis. Heat degradation of a substance in the absence of oxygen without setting off combustion reactions. Gases, liquids and combustible solids are obtained.
  • Anaerobic digestion of sludge. Usually seen in treatment plants, but also in landfills. It is a microbial fermentation that produces combustible biogas and digested sludge
  • Landfill gas recovery. This process captures the gases generated in landfills for subsequent combustion.

The global system has generated a scenario in which burning waste to obtain combustible materials to burn later is a better option; although the focus should be on reducing waste and maximizing recycling.

Practical cases of cities that burn their rubbish

Waste to energy

Analyzed by the percentage of municipal waste burned, Japan (75%), Denmark (67%), Belgium (48%), Switzerland (47%) and the United Kingdom (42%) are at the top of the list. But there are cities that stand out for the volume of waste processed or their contribution to the city’s mix.

  • The Spittelau waste incineration plant in Vienna, burns 250,000 tons per year to generate 500 GWh of heat and 60 GWh of electricity.
  • The Maishima Incineration Plant in Osaka, located on an artificial island ‘reclaimed’ from the sea, is a 32 MWp Its artistic design attracts 12,000 visitors each year.
  • Hidden underground in the Parisian suburb, three miles from the Eiffel Tower, the Isséane Incineration Plant is capable of burning half a million tons per year.
  • In Minneapolis, the Hennepin incineration plant processes 27% of the county’s waste.
  • In Copenhagen, the Amager Bakke/Copenhill incineration plant hopes to be integrated into the metropolitan landscape while it burns 440,000 tons per year and heats 150,000 homes.

Energy recovery is used across the world by hundreds of cities. In Europe, around 500 plants of this sort emit around 52 million tons of CO2 each year. However, there is expected to be a drop in usage as new urban waste taxes come into force levied on what is generated.

In regions such as China, global leaders in energy recovery, and a country that continues to open new plants, they are trying to solve the original problem with a waste reduction policy, often resulting in planned stoppages.

Image | Thijs Kennis

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

DT
Dimitrios Thanos
Mainzer Mobilität
PD
patrizio diodati
open fiber
Responsible for Special projects and Smart Cities projects
AT
Ais Amalia Tsani
Airlangga University
Undergraduate Student
RW
Ray Wescott
Telematics Wireless Limited
European Business Development
AR
ARANCHA ROBLES
TE Connectivity
MR
Melissa Rossi
Yahoo News
AK
ashok kumar
trinity
Igor Šenkarčin
driving.digital
AN
ANISSA NURUL IZZAH
Marine and Fishery Polytechnic of Sidoarjo
Student
AH
Anchi Huang
ITRI
Research associate
CB
Christian Massimiliano Baldin
Università di Pavia
Università di Pavia - Laboratory of Geomatics
SW
Sarah Williams
Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council
Senior Physical Regeneration Officer in the Regeneration Opportunities Team of the Council
PP
paola pao
jaj
SA
Subroto Asto
Miota
Chief strategy officer
CJ
Canovas Jorge
EU Innovation Council
JP
José Leonardo Pérez Niño
Universidad de Pamplona
Investigador de Semillero
AD
Ana Maria Diaz
Turner & Townsend
Project Manager
DJ
Djohan Pahlawan Joe
PT ANDAYASA DWICIPTA
Director
LK
Laima Klemas
ISA
EE&RE Specialist
KC
Katerin Lizet Cueva Bardales
Privado

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.