The Chinese dilemma of waste-to-energy plants
This article is also available here in Spanish.

The Chinese dilemma of waste-to-energy plants

My list

Author | Jaime RamosThe urban growth projection for the coming decades brings with it new challenges. One of these is the issue of how to manage the waste that is generated, which is increasing at an alarming rate and particularly in specific areas of the planet.Storing and recycling waste are fast becoming a specific sector that requires efficient and clean technological solutions. China is aiming to go one step further by focusing its efforts on converting waste into energy at never before seen levels. The latest and impressive project aimed at contributing to this goal can be found at the mega-plant that is being built in the city of Shenzhen.

Shenzhen and the new generation of incineration plants

Chinese cities produce more waste than any other city in the world. In the case of Shenzhen and, according to SHL, the company behind the project, the city has to deal with around 15,000 tonnes of waste every day. Furthermore, the problem is not just about existing waste practices, but also what to do with future waste. The increase in the population of Shenzhen means that waste generation will increase by around 7% each year.The solution put forward by the SHL architects, consists of a giant plant covering an area of 112,645 m2, capable of incinerating one third of the city’s existing waste and generating energy. It is estimated that it could produce around 550 million kWh per year. The roof of the main building would provide part of the electricity thanks to the installation of 44,000 mof solar panels.The idea is for this complex to enhance the image of China’s existing waste incineration plants. To do so, the most advanced technological systems will be installed and this micro-city deigned for waste management will also be used as an information point for Shenzhen’s citizens.

Chinese waste management model: advantages and disadvantages

The Shenzhen plant is expected to be running by 2020. Work began in 2016 and since then, the project has had its fair share of critics. One of the clearest examples is related to the fact that the process of converting waste into electricity does not prevent the emission of large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The developers of the complex defended the project by arguing that the new plant minimises greenhouse gas emissions.The residents in the area where the large building is being constructed have also expressed their dissatisfaction through protests.  In fact, protests in China as a result of the installation of incineration plants are becoming more common. The authorities in turn, are not backing down and they are determined to continue with their commitment to improve waste incineration processes. Accordingly, the goal is to build a further 300 plants similar to those in Shenzhen, in other cities across China.Is there an alternative to waste incineration?Much of the negative criticism received by waste-to-energy conversion processes stems from the fact that, in the energy sector, 100% clean production processes should be implemented. But then, what should we do with the thousands of tonnes generated every day?  The other main option, instead of burning our waste, is not to generate waste and to recycle it.Although these may seem like more complicated options to actually implement, many large cities such as San Francisco are already studying plans along these lines. Perhaps the issue for China is whether, with its existing rate of waste generation, it can sustain solutions like these, which require a longer-term approach.Images | iStock/Denise Hasse, iStock/TomasSeredaiStock/c1a1p1c1o1m1

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

JS
Julia Saklakova
MIPU
International Business Development Manager
MR
Muhammad Ravi fachreza Reza
Universitas muhammadiyah Surakarta
Operations is the work of managing the inner workings of your business so it runs as efficiently as
TT
Test Test
startcat
FE
Fiorella Espinoza
Calidoscopi
Director on Calidoscopi Company
MO
Maria Mercedes Ordoñez
Local Government of Godoy Cruz
Head of Department of Environmental Assessments
FG
Frank Gaugel
bluepill Group
MD
PM
Paulo Marques Augusto
Cascais Próxima E.M.,S.A.
HI
haruki imaizumi
NRI
Nomura Research Institute
ED
Edel Bertine Dirdal
Stavanger Region European Office
European Coordinator
GM
Gian Mi
Estudent
NN
NADIA BURGOS NADIA BURGOS
Ecopil Arte Crea Conciencia A. C.
I coordinate 10 youth groups in Mexico through the Forest, Wetlands and Sustainable Tourism
TP
Tomás Pérez
jhj
RG
Randy gomez
UTP
IF
Ismael Fernandez
IFM International
Partner, Senior Adviser & Consultant
TT
TEST TEST
ELOGIA MEDIA, S.L.
test
GR
Gagan Reddy
Cittamap
CEO - Data Lead / Cittamap
AR
Ana Rodríguez
Company
PM
PILAR MARTINEZ
FBM
General Director
CP
Catalina Polini
Synthesis Design Studio
Co-Founder
OG
Olushola Gegele
Haads global services ltd

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.