The Chinese dilemma of waste-to-energy plants
This article is also available here in Spanish.

The Chinese dilemma of waste-to-energy plants

My list

Author | Jaime RamosThe urban growth projection for the coming decades brings with it new challenges. One of these is the issue of how to manage the waste that is generated, which is increasing at an alarming rate and particularly in specific areas of the planet.Storing and recycling waste are fast becoming a specific sector that requires efficient and clean technological solutions. China is aiming to go one step further by focusing its efforts on converting waste into energy at never before seen levels. The latest and impressive project aimed at contributing to this goal can be found at the mega-plant that is being built in the city of Shenzhen.

Shenzhen and the new generation of incineration plants

Chinese cities produce more waste than any other city in the world. In the case of Shenzhen and, according to SHL, the company behind the project, the city has to deal with around 15,000 tonnes of waste every day. Furthermore, the problem is not just about existing waste practices, but also what to do with future waste. The increase in the population of Shenzhen means that waste generation will increase by around 7% each year.The solution put forward by the SHL architects, consists of a giant plant covering an area of 112,645 m2, capable of incinerating one third of the city’s existing waste and generating energy. It is estimated that it could produce around 550 million kWh per year. The roof of the main building would provide part of the electricity thanks to the installation of 44,000 mof solar panels.The idea is for this complex to enhance the image of China’s existing waste incineration plants. To do so, the most advanced technological systems will be installed and this micro-city deigned for waste management will also be used as an information point for Shenzhen’s citizens.

Chinese waste management model: advantages and disadvantages

The Shenzhen plant is expected to be running by 2020. Work began in 2016 and since then, the project has had its fair share of critics. One of the clearest examples is related to the fact that the process of converting waste into electricity does not prevent the emission of large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The developers of the complex defended the project by arguing that the new plant minimises greenhouse gas emissions.The residents in the area where the large building is being constructed have also expressed their dissatisfaction through protests.  In fact, protests in China as a result of the installation of incineration plants are becoming more common. The authorities in turn, are not backing down and they are determined to continue with their commitment to improve waste incineration processes. Accordingly, the goal is to build a further 300 plants similar to those in Shenzhen, in other cities across China.Is there an alternative to waste incineration?Much of the negative criticism received by waste-to-energy conversion processes stems from the fact that, in the energy sector, 100% clean production processes should be implemented. But then, what should we do with the thousands of tonnes generated every day?  The other main option, instead of burning our waste, is not to generate waste and to recycle it.Although these may seem like more complicated options to actually implement, many large cities such as San Francisco are already studying plans along these lines. Perhaps the issue for China is whether, with its existing rate of waste generation, it can sustain solutions like these, which require a longer-term approach.Images | iStock/Denise Hasse, iStock/TomasSeredaiStock/c1a1p1c1o1m1

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

C-
C. Isqy Karima Puteri -
-
-
JH
Jana Helder
Form Follows You
YY
Yamin Yamin XU
World Economic Forum
MT
mer torri
utp
PA
Putu Angie Maharani Angie
Kointerior
Interior Designer
AC
Andrea Castellar
DISCOMON
GF
GONZALO EDUARDO FLOREZ FUENTES
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE SANTA MARIA
SH
Sandy Hinsbi
PNP
PL
Pranvera Leka
Officinae Verdi spa
European Projects Unit Manager and coordinator
EW
Edith Wouters
AR-TUR platform for architecture and spac
JM
Julia Moreno
Forética
Senior Manager. Responsible for Climate Change and Urban Sustainabii
MP
MARCOS PLANELLO
Neocert
Leader of experience in chain of custody, traceability and due diligence
LS
Lars Soerensen
Microsoft Corporation
Specialist
MJ
Maren Evensmo Jacobsen
Nordic Edge
Marketing Manager
PC
Paloma Campomanes
ELEVEN LAB
Marketing Manager
RB
Richard Becker
UDLAP
Energy Engineering at UDLAP
ML
Mendy Lucas
Pop-up Urbain
DM
Daniel Mantovani
ECOL Saneamiento Ambiental
CEO
DC
DANIEL CJ
NA
CEO
EJ
Erwindy Jossi
Ministry of public works and housing
Water resources analyst

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.