Safety and public participation
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Safety and public participation: how citizen collaboration is helping to create safer cities

My list

Author | Jaime Ramos

Information technologies and artificial intelligence have opened up a whole host of opportunities. Undoubtedly, the degree of citizen engagement in urban processes offers a potential unseen until now. Can these tools be used to boost urban safety?

Citizen involvement for safety

The participation of members of a community is essential in terms of fostering healthy groups, cultivating a sense of belonging to a community and, in general, community wellbeing. Local authorities are aware of this trend, which also includes the area of security and protection.

Public security services, such as police forces, benefit from relationships of trust among the population and these groups. That level of public involvement can lead to a better integration of police services.

The U.S. web platform, Police1, illustrates some examples of police agents who highlight the importance of strengthening bonds. The Chief of Police, Janie Schutz, explained that “in a democracy, effective police are reliant on citizen cooperation at minimum”.

In her article, she highlights the importance of citizen involvement when investigating crimes. In her experience, she refers to the citizen collaboration that helped catch one of the perpetrators of the Boston Marathon terrorist attack: “a member of the community consciously decided to get involved and thanks to that something good happened”.

Technologies that foster involvement for safety

If we add to this desired relationship of trust between citizens and security services, all that state-of-the-art technologies can offer in terms of protection, we have before us a whole new scenario.

Of course, the effect of citizen involvement through these methods also comes with ethical and moral challenges in terms of privacy and freedom, as with the proliferation of CCTV, mass sensorization or the establishment of social control frameworks. After all, there are many apps that are reminiscent of the iconography of Dystopian works such as ‘1984’.

In any event, today there are numerous digital tools aimed at creating stronger connections between citizens and public protection services.

Digital participation platforms

Although they include countless features to strengthen institutional communication with communities, the services offered by platforms such as Ave Point or Citizen Lab may help prevent future problems. They do so by offering a digital listening platform. Seattle’s inclusion plan is a good example of how to make citizen engagement more available to the wider community through various virtual activities.

Citizen security and information management apps

These types of tools are also becoming more generalized and more successful. In the United States, My mobile witness is a good example, an app that allows online complaints to be submitted and images of suspicious activities can be sent to the country’s security services.

Another aspect of this involvement is how to channel the information obtained from citizens’ collaboration. The Japanese multinational NEC offers another platform that contributes to the management of the same.

My Safetipin is another, different, example of how technology can be molded and adapted to urban requirements but with more social awareness. It enables new types of parameters to be reported, which end up geolocated, from lighting, to the presence of police, women, children and even the perceived sense of safety.

The original idea of this app based in India began by identifying safe spaces for women and, in general, for everyone. One of the founders, Kalpana Viswanath, explains that building safer cities for women means safer cities for everyone.

Images | Freepik/freepik

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

IG
Indiana Gqwede
City of Cape Town
DM
Dary Morantes
SJ
Sivaram J
Kongu
Student
AA
ALDO DANIEL ALLENDE
ALLENDE SEGURIDAD
MANAGER
EP
eva pascoe
Cybersalon.org
director
RS
Rachel Stern
Govtech Ventures
CB
claudi0 bernardes
Ingai Urbanismo
MS
Mario Sobral
KH
Krüger Hannes
Schlentzek & Kühn GmbH
Salesman
CF
carlos clemente florencio urbano
CCC
IF
Ignasi Fontanals
REZILIO TECHNOLOGIE
Director Europe
ML
MARIO LAOS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEOPLASTIC DISEASE FROM PERU
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SPECIALIST
MB
Marcos Belle
Transpetro
Manager
AC
Anna Chamiec-Pauneto
IMEX MANAGEMENT
AP
Antonio Petz
Index Consulting
TT
Tracy Thomas
Stellar Marketing and Business Solutions
AT
Anshuman Tiwari
Surguja Digital Works
Sales and marketing
VP
Vincent Paumier
AXIS
Sales Manager for Public Entity
HH
Hana Holoubkova
The Team Smart Solutions s.r.o
JA
Juan Alfonso
SERCATIC SA
Consultant

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.