Achieving the Triple S: smartness, safety and security. Utopia or reality?

Achieving the Triple S: smartness, safety and security. Utopia or reality?

My list

Author | This is a guest post written by Valentina Taddeo, Marketing & Communication Leader of Paradox Engineering SA – MinebeaMitsumi Group

Cities around the world are increasingly turning to digital innovation to enhance their residents’ lives, increase the variety and quality of services’, face climate change connected risks and manage business’ expectations of opportunities and economic growth – all while dealing with regulations and budget challenges.

Becoming “smart” is not just about a city being tech-savvy, it also implies using the data deriving from the technology to implement services to the benefit of citizens, businesses, and the environment. A city turns smart when it can take informed decisions based on real data and change and adapt its services based on tangible evidence.

FROM SMARTNESS TO SAFETY

Citizen’s safety and their sense of security is today a major concern to all municipalities. A smart city that fails to make its residents safe is failing one of the main concepts of being smart: understanding the needs of the citizens and take appropriate action to solve them. The “sensorization” of a city, just like the arms of a person, thus enables city managers to feel and understand the urban landscape.

Through the analysis of the data collected by the sensors, city managers can then implement strategies to make the city more resilient, attractive and ultimately safe. The deployment of environmental sensors, for instance, accomplishes two main objectives: on the one hand these sensors provide a more local and granular picture of the environmental parameters, in order for instance to activate or deactivate services like public garden’s irrigations, or have a better prediction of the solar panel energy outputs based on solar irradiation level; on the other hand, by monitoring the heat and UV intensity, public authorities can generate alerts when certain thresholds are reached and inform citizens to stay indoors or to avoid a certain area of the city where heat and solar irradiation is beyond safe levels.

These “threshold-triggered alerts” are in place in Japan already, for example, where an increasingly elderly population suffer the most from heatstroke.

FROM SAFETY TO SECURITY

The sense of safety is however twofold: it also encompasses the digital identity, the personal data, as well as business and governmental data that are stored and managed on the same platform. With an increasing number of smart applications and devices linked on the same IoT network, connected devices may represent the ideal entry point for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities and get access to people’s data, take control of critical infrastructures or hijack business operations.

Ensuring cybersecurity of a smart city is a daunting problem but it cannot be overlooked: cybersecurity skills and resources, appropriate selection of suppliers, right procedures in place – all concur to defer, limit, and respond to cyberthreats, and to avoid citizens’ prejudice and refusal of new ambitious city plans towards new applications and technologies.

ACHIEVING THE TRIPLE S: IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE?

Achieving smartness, safety and security should not be a utopia: with the right tools, processes and technology suppliers in place, cities can benefit from smart solutions to increase citizen’s safety and build a strong defence against cyberattacks. Safety and security are high in the agenda of Paradox Engineering, an IoT technology provider part of MinebeaMitsumi Group that offers full scale solutions developed with a security-by-design and security-by-default approach.

Their Smart Urban Network enables the monitoring and control of all connected devices, with the possibility of triggering alerts when certain thresholds are reached. Smart city customers of Paradox Engineering can also benefit from the services of a Security Operation Centre (SOC), that monitors, detects and responds in case of cyberattack. Gijon, in Spain, Las Condes, in Chile, or Nasuhiobara, in Japan, are only few examples of smart cities that are relying on Paradox Engineering’s technology and expertise and managed to build a robust IoT infrastructure for the betterment of their citizens.

Images | SigmundAlex Eckermann, Alejandro Perez, Denys Nevozhai

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

RD
Ruth Delvin
LABU
LC
leonardo carvalho
Editora Poliedro
coordinator
ÁI
Ángel IDONE
Ángeles Company
Innovation Advisor
EB
ezgi bentürk
İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi
JV
Jayanth Vadyala
Barcelona Technology School
EO
Eugenio Oñate Hospital
OKTICS ATZ SL
Chief Operations Officer
LL
luxmaior lim
HDs, Inc.
Dir
IS
Isaac H Sutton
Medicevo Corporation
CEO of Valo Smart City
LG
LALIT MOHAN GOYAL
J C BOSE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, YMCA, FARIDABAD HARYANA
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
CF
Camilo Fernández
Metro Linea 1
KK
KISEOK KIM
ETRI
FB
Fatemeh Badel
The School of Architecture
DP
Dr.P.Kubendran.MBA, PhD
Dept of Municiapl Administration
JOINT DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
JA
Juan Acosta López
Ayuntamiento de Mengíbar
Agente de innovación
RP
Richard Potter
Microsoft
CTO
SA
Sultan Alkharabsheh
Greater Amman municipality
It manager and chief of smart city project
JG
Joanna Grodzka
EMEA
RR
RainerRodewaldom Rodewald
SAP SE
MG
Mark Gregory
St Benedicts College
AA
Adinda Larasati Adinda
Jambi University
Student

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.