Singles and urbanism: towards cities with fewer couples
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Singles and urbanism: towards cities with fewer couples

My list

Authors | Jaime Ramos, Elvira Esparza

Living alone is one of the silent trends affecting today’s urbanism. It may be hard to believe, but the phenomenon has implications that go beyond the demographic sphere. How is it affecting cities and their economies?

The trend toward living alone has been rising the world over for years. The progression tends to increase, particularly in certain countries. There is one criterion on which they coincide, having higher per capita income.

Our world in data indicates that the trend is not the same in all countries. It cites Northern Europe as an example, with increases of approximately 40%; in relation to lower income Asian countries, in which the trend has remained unchanged. On the other hand, in Asia and the Pacific, one-person households are experiencing the highest increase, specifically, a 31% increase.

A recent study by the Pew Research Center indicates that 50% of single people in the United States prefer to remain unmarried. The study also predicts that a quarter of young adults today may reach the age of 50 without ever marrying. “Consciously single” is a growing trend fueled by the desire to prioritize other areas of life or simply enjoy the freedom that comes with independence.

Single: a demographic definition

Without taking into account stereotypes that may exist in certain cultures, being single, in a narrow sense, consists of a marital status identified by the absence of a spouse. However, this concept extends to not having a partner and/or family or other members who share the same household as a personal choice.

This is the perspective inspiring studies exploring the phenomenon. Although we can go back in time to find the origins of this mode of living in major sociological works such as those of Max Weber, today’s trends are more recent. Specifically, historical records suggest that the preference to live alone began about one hundred years ago, and accelerated during the 1950s in countries like Norway and Sweden.

That demographic difference, with anthropological implications, has brought with it changes, for both those living it directly, and at a macro scale in economic, social and even environmental aspects.

Problems, risks and solutions

single

In terms of single people, it is hard to isolate the term from the more traditional negative connotations. In some regions, living alone is synonymous with resilience or professional success and, even “social emancipation” of women. In others, it may suggest certain pressure caused by an endemic isolation, poverty or inequality.

What some agencies can confirm, including official U.S. departments of health, is that living alone after the age of 50 can bring with it health complications: from premature death, increased risk of dementia, depression, anxiety, and heart problems that interact with psychological problems. Solving these issues requires health services to be strengthened and for the authorities to know how to identify the challenges that the community is facing.

Cities favored by singles

single

Cities have a great deal to say in this matter. On the one hand, local institutions must get involved in identifying the differences between “living alone” and “being alone”. But, furthermore, experts have observed several types of effects.

These can be seen in major cities such as Berlin, Paris and Oslo, in which more than 50% of the households are occupied by single residents. In Stockholm, this type of occupancy reached 60% in 2012. And they are not isolated cases. In the United States, 83% of the 200 largest cities have experienced a very significant rise.

Does it have a higher economic cost on urban economies?

The relationship between single life and the negative economic consequences this may entail is a complex issue. There are a whole host of demographic and economic studies based on the relationship between the economy concepts. This one, for example, highlights the implications on savings and tax matters in China, Japan and India.

In order to analyze single life in greater depth, some studies introduce added parameters, such as the degree of cultural sociability. This is the case with some backed by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, which coincide in that communities with more members who “feel alone” are more limited in terms of generating wealth.

Another report conducted in China, collected data from 1997 to 2018 to answer the question as to whether living alone increases the consumption of social resources. In China, one-person households exceed 240 million. In the conclusions, the authors indicate that living alone entails increased consumption of resources and greater generation of waste.

However, they also identified some positive trends, such as attempts to resolve the preceding issues with sustainability measures. In this respect, the living alone trend has similarities with Micro-Housing.

Effects on the environment

Over 15 years ago, and along these same lines, The Guardian referred to a study, which indicated that the number of one-member households, in contrast to those with four members, entailed a 38% increase in general consumption, 55% in energy demand and 61% in gas. Recent studies in this area also confirm this.

To avoid both the pessimism regarding the consequences of this way of life, and to prevent the negative impacts resulting from the same, cities must take into account numerous factors, beginning with the clues arising from the age of those living alone.

The Euromonitor consulting firm indicates population ageing as a key factor. According to its studies, the concept of family is changing. Single-person households will record a 128% growth in 2000-2030; while the total number of household heads aged 60+ will reach 807 million by 2030. These are demographic statistics, which cannot be interpreted separately and which will bring with them healthcare, coexistence and sustainability challenges.

Why is the number of single people higher in cities than in rural areas?

single

There are several reasons why cities have a higher number of single people compared to rural areas.

  • Greater access to educational opportunities: Cities offer a wider range of educational opportunities, prompting young people from rural areas to migrate in pursuit of higher education.
  • Professional development: Prioritizing professional careers in today’s competitive job market is one of the key reasons young people delay marriage and choose to remain single.
  • Lifestyle: Cities provide a broader range of cultural, social, and entertainment activities compared to rural areas. This environment encourages more individualistic lifestyles and fosters greater acceptance of singleness as a valid life choice.
  • Social media and technology: Connectivity and urban dating apps broaden social circles, yet at the same time, they can make it harder to form lasting relationships, contributing to the high rates of singleness in cities.

The situation differs in rural areas, where traditional and conservative communities place a greater emphasis on marriage and early family formation. There is stronger social pressure to marry and start a family. Social networks are smaller, making it easier to establish personal relationships that lead to marriage.

How are single people changing life in cities?

The rise in single-person households is reshaping the real estate market in cities, as demand for smaller living spaces continues to grow. In some cities, single-person homes may account for up to half of all households, according to this report. In Europe, EU data shows that around 33% of households are single-person households. In addition to the rise in single-person households, the number of shared households among adults is also increasing. This trend is not only evident in major cities like New York but is also emerging in regions with strong family traditions, such as Southern Europe and East Asia.

Geographic studies indicate that this new wave of single individuals is predominantly young, urban dwellers who live alone but who are not loners. Thanks to digital technologies and smartphones, they stay connected and socialize in shared spaces such as gyms and bars.

There has also been a noticeable delay in the age of first marriage, as young people tend to postpone this step until they complete their higher education and focus on their professional careers. Spain, for example, has the latest average age for first marriage in the EU, with men marrying at 36.8 years and women at 34.7 years, according to  Eurostat.

Lastly, the rise in single individuals is impacting birth rates, which have declined from 5.3 births per woman 60 years ago to 2.3 today, according to the World Bank. Furthermore, as women delay the age at which they have their first child, the overall number of children per family decreases, contributing to aging populations in some countries.

To address this issue, some governments have introduced incentives to boost birth rates and support family formation. This, in turn, has led to another phenomenon: the rise of single-parent households, where individuals raise children alone and require specific forms of assistance.

Images | Freepik, Gradikaa Aggi, Diego San, Deleece Cook

Related Content

Recommended profiles for you

YK
YeeKee Ku
The University of Melbourne
PhD
KL
Kilho LEE
FIBERPRO
MV
Margarita Velásquez
VN ARCHITECTS
Ceo
LA
Lawrence Agbemabiese
Planning and Policy Associates LLC
XL
Xinmun Lum
Smart Nation and Digital Government Office
KK
Ka-Adilobari Kari
Heri Homes and Properties
JK
Jen Kim
Heriot-Watt University
MSc Candidate in Smart Cities and Communities - Erasmus Mundus Joint Masters Degree
MP
Manon Pellas
LuxMobility
RK
Rutwik Reddy Karra
VNIT
4th Year
JS
joao silva
IAAC
Student
MM
Musfi Musfi Yuliadi
Pasarmu.id
Business Development Director
MR
Musaab Rustom
COMMUNICATION REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Interconnection & Numbering Support Specialist
CM
CARLES MOTAS LÓPEZ
AJUNTAMENT SANT FELIU DE GUIXOLS
Alcalde de Sant Feliu de Guíxols
RA
Rui Andrade
Waymotion
JR
Juan Rangel
EY
Senior Consultant
MK
Mark Kozakiewicz
Y2Architecture
JJ
Juan Juano12
Peru
Hola
MP
MONTSE POBLET
catradio
jounalist
JM
joão Marques
University of Aveiro
RL
Rhodalyn Lumague
City Government of Makati
Housing Homesite Regulation Assistant