This article is available also in spanish here

Why do some smart cities fail?

My list

Author | Jaime Ramos

Why do many smart cities fail to take off? We have associated smart cities with a combination of almost Utopian promises of wellbeing. What obstacles stop us from reaching the established expectations?

What is considered a successful smart city or a failed project?

Measuring the success of a smart city is not a simple task. On the whole, we have inherited a series of tools from the sciences of demography and sociology that help us to establish parameters that go beyond borders.

Smart cities considered to have failed share a drop in per capita income, in the price of housing and, ultimately, in the population itself. The first parameter is a classic clue regarding the average degree of social wellbeing; the second constitutes a warning of economic decline and that the abandonment seen in the third is likely to occur.

The fundamental mission of smart cities is to encourage the opposite route via numerous instruments. In doing so, the educational arena acts as a particular glue and lubricant that connects social and economic dynamics.

The dream of a smart city that never happened

smart cities fail 2

The problem is that many of the instruments that give smart cities an identity can be considered double-edged swords. That is, beyond the aforementioned parameters, the success of a smart city tends to be confused with the actual technological means that seek that ideal.

Smart cities that never take off tend to elevate their ambitions through mistaken approaches, like those they follow.

Errors when identifying challenges and problems

Detroit or Manchester are normally cited as major examples of urban cities that were unable to identify the immediate social and economic challenges and insisted on models that ended up leading to their industrial decline.

Ordos,China's ghost city, is a modern example of how the advantages of a macro-smart city project can end up being a fiasco as a result of mistakes made at the time of determining local requirements. Today, only around 100,000 people live there, very different from the million people it should have housed according to the targets of an initiative that cost $200 billion dollars in 2001.

Immature technology

The promises and expectations generated are also cut short as a result of embracing incomplete technological solutions. The investment and efforts required by technologies such as autonomous driving or urban air mobility, entail risks related to innovations that still have years of development before them.

Imperfect technologies that jeopardize, discriminate or pollute

smart cities fail 3

The most perverse side of technological advancements in cities stems constitutes the ideal premise of any science fiction author. There are countless examples, such as CCTV surveillance systems in public places, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence that promise greater security and administrative efficiency and end up as repressive or discriminatory instruments; monetized technologies to generate class privileges or technological solutions that increase the energy and sustainability issue.

A study by Lux Research that appeared in Forbes highlighted the supply problems due to the inability to deliver millions of batteries that power the sensors associated with Big Data, not to mention the harmful emissions in the production of that energy.

Another example analyzed in numerous forums is the Rio de Janeiro and IBM partnership. The agreement led to the development of a series of software products for smart cities, which increased the gap between more and less privileged citizens.

Lack of urban leadership

smart cities fail 4

Given these distortions, it is essential to achieve a balance between policies that support the public strategies of what intend to be considered smart cities (particularly, in interferences of private interests). This is nothing new.

The Canadian researcher, Jane Jacobs already hinted at it in 1961 in her book 'The Death and Life of Great American Cities': "private investment shapes cities, but social ideas (and laws) shape private investment. First comes the idea of what we want, then, the mechanism must be adapted to achieve that image".

Images | Freepik/wirestock, Freepik/rawpixel.com, Freepik/jcomp, Freepik/onlyyouqj

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

Remember to activate your profile to network!
Activate profile
Lorena Paulina Acosta Rivera
Lorena Paulina Acosta Rivera
Privada
Jagmohan Singh Bajaj
Jagmohan Singh Bajaj
UNESCO
Special Envoy and Focal point of UNESCO in Balkan Region
jr
jose rodriguez
Municipality of Canovanas
Vice Mayor
Katja Schaefer
Katja Schaefer
UN-Habitat
Leading the UN-Habitat Flagship Programme on "People-centred Smart Cities"
Maximovitch Clara
Maximovitch Clara
Opendatasoft
Business developer
Barbara  Pons-Giner
Barbara Pons-Giner
Ajuntament de Barcelona
AF
Amilto Francisquevis
ICI
Estrategic
HO
Hernán Orozco
Universidad tecnológica metropolitana
Professor
Timothée Rakotonandrianina
Timothée Rakotonandrianina
The Political Agenda
Public Affairs consultant with an interest in Political Research (Libertarianism, Transhumanism).
Fernando Kanni
Fernando Kanni
Horwath HTL
Owner/Technical Director
Fabricio FARIAS
Fabricio FARIAS
Conectando Córdoba
Tesorero
DC
Decaterina Candelaria
Green Releaf
Project Manager
RC
Raquel Cardamone
Bright Cities
CEO
YS
Yull Salcedo
Esri Colombia SAS
Government Sales Director
HA
Hugo Alves Silva
Município de Mealhada
Khushi Tanwar
Khushi Tanwar
D. Y. Patil International University
Student
Ovidiu Slimac
Ovidiu Slimac
ROVEST Cluster
Secretary General
RH
Raju Halomoan
Lintasarta
BUSINESS solution manager
Marit  Swensen
Marit Swensen
Nordland Fylkeskommune
JM
Jo Maher
KHDA
Advisor to Director General

SmartCity
Thank you for registering to Tomorrow.City. You can now start exploring from your computer, or with your phone or tablet downloading our app!
Only accessible for registered users
This content is available only for registered users
TO: $$toName$$
SUBJECT: Message from $$fromName$$