EPCOT, Walt Disney’s failed plan to create the city of tomorrow in the sixties
This article is also available here in Spanish.

EPCOT, Walt Disney’s failed plan to create the city of tomorrow in the sixties

My list

Authors | Pablo Vinuesa, Elvira Esparza

In the mid-sixties, Walt Disney tried to make his dream of creating the city of tomorrow a reality by using state-of-the-art technology of the time. It was called the EPCOT, Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow. It wasn’t a success, but many of the ideas of this planned futuristic city were pioneering at the time and, had the project materialized, the impact would have been revolutionary.

Despite us all knowing him for his movies, Walt Disney was also interested in other aspects unrelated to fantasy and animation, such as technology and urbanism. Obsessed with the idea of creating a perfect city, he designed the EPCOT project, which after numerous changes, ended up being radically different to what he first imagined.

What did Walt Disney want to create with EPCOT?

futuristic city

The first thing that needs to be made clear is that the initial design did not contemplate building another theme pavilion within Disney World. His idea was extremely ambitious: to create a city of tomorrow based on state-of-the-art technology and on what he considered to be a more logical approach than the existing urban planning models.

The main reason for this was that day-to-day living in modern cities did not seem to convince Walt Disney, who romanticized with the idea of life in the countryside. Waking up to the noise of a garbage truck or seeing dirty playgrounds for children were what lead him to look into unusual solutions.

But, did Walt Disney really intend to create a city? This is a hard question to answer now. His death prevented us from seeing it become a reality, but according to his collaborators from the time, the project was quite serious.

When did the EPCOT idea come about?

There are lots of clues in Disney’s biography to suggest that he had been planning it for decades. Over a period of 50 years, he could often be seen reading futuristic literature. He also held meetings with leading tech companies and he was obsessed with the new possibilities in the area of mobility.

He was particularly interested in the monorail, which he first introduced in the Californian Disneyland park in 1959. And in 1964, he became fascinated with a study by the Austrian architect Victor Gruen, a pioneer in the design of modern shopping malls, entitled ‘The Heart of Our Cities: The Urban Crisis: Diagnosis and Cure’

Books such as Steve Mannheim’s Walt Disney and the Quest for Community, tell the story of the adventures and mishaps of making EPCOT a reality. For example, purchasing acres of land in Florida that covered almost double the size of Manhattan, for the sum of more than $5 million at the time.

Who designed EPCOT and what was the vision?

Disney had the support of an elite close-knit community, known as the Imagineers, which included, among others, the illustrator Herbert Ryman, the designer John Hench, the transport specialist Bob Gurr, the set designer Harper Goff and the architect George Rester. Another key figure is Marty Sklar, who joined the Disney marketing department in the 50s.

During intense meetings a circular design was created with concentric rings that would accommodate businesses, homes, apartments and green spaces. The designs show a center protected by a dome to control the city’s temperature. The idea was to free the earth’s surface from road traffic, which would move underground, leaving the streets open and safe for pedestrians. Communication between the different rings of the city would be carried out by monorail lines. This city was designed to accommodate about 20,000 residents who would work for the Disney company or for businesses established in the city, in order to prevent the formation of slums and ghettos.

In addition, the city would be self-sufficient thanks to the use of renewable energies such as solar and wind power, while futuristic homes would use home automation to control all functions and implement efficient waste systems.

This was all materialized in a presentation drawn up in 1966 for legislators, the production of which is impeccable, typical of Disney. His idealistic vision came crashing down as has been the case, at numerous levels, with projects such as the city of Brasilia or Le Corbusier’s Ville Radieuse. Afterall, establishing the city of tomorrow in the middle of Florida was never going to be easy. His premature death made the project lose all momentum.

Does Disney’s EPCOT work today?

futuristic city

After becoming yet another failed city of tomorrow project, today EPCOT is a theme park within the Walt Disney World Resort facilities in Florida, better known as Disney World. It is divided into two distinct sections, Future World and World Showcase, dedicated to technological innovation and international culture, respectively.

It is a version adapted to Disney’s specific characteristics of what we know as World Exposition. When it was inaugurated on October 1, 1982, it was called Epcot Center, in lowercase letters. After being changed to EPCOT 94 and EPCOT 95, the center is currently referred to in its section on the official Walt Disney World page as simply EPCOT. It is home to permanent and specific exhibitions, for examples those dedicated to spring and other cultures, including Moroccan and Chinese cultures.

Today EPCOT is a mere shadow of what Disney originally wanted to make, but despite having become something very different to the original idea some of his ideas are reflected in much more modern projects such as NEOM, the futuristic city in the middle of the Saudi desert, or Telosa, the smart city designed by the multimillionaire Marc Lore.

Why did EPCOT fail?

Walt Disney’s death is the main reason EPCOT was never built, as the project depended entirely on his vision and leadership. Walt personally oversaw every aspect of the project, and after his passing, no one in the company was able to carry the city forward.

On top of that, his brother and successor, Roy, felt he was not capable of continuing the project, and after his death, a decisive change in the company’s leadership took place. The new management decided to abandon the idea of creating a futuristic city and replace it with a theme park.

Furthermore, the high financial investment required to make the project a reality, along with the logistics needed to put it into operation, exceeded the company’s economic capabilities. Faced with that situation, the solution was to turn EPCOT into an area within the theme park, while still maintaining a focus on innovation, technology, and progress.

futuristic city

Another problem that made the creation of EPCOT difficult was legal in nature, as there were concerns about the control of citizens’ privacy, since they would be under constant supervision. Walt intended for the company to control the city’s operating rules, meaning that residents would have no municipal voting rights and would not even own their homes. This system of city organization also raised questions about how many people would be willing to live in such a tightly controlled environment.

From the original project, the collaboration with technology corporations such as Siemens and Exxon was maintained so they could showcase their technological advances. However, over time, the involvement of these tech companies has decreased, while Disney’s own attractions, absent at the beginning of the project, have gained greater prominence.

Later, in the 1990s, the Walt Disney Company built the city of Celebration in Florida which, while lacking the futuristic character of EPCOT, incorporated some of the principles Walt Disney had envisioned for his city. The design of Celebration was inspired by the main street of the Magic Kingdom theme park, featuring a strong sense of community and guided by principles of sustainability and environmental conservation. Today, Disney no longer owns Celebration.

Images | cover and interior image by Brian McGowan, The Original EPCOT, Disney

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

MR
Marco Ramirez
Geocity Studio
Architect
TD
Tom Dennis
HITactics Inc
IoT and AI solutions and services
PF
Patrick Fong
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Associate Professor
WC
Wonwook Choi
Anyang University
Fellow Researcher
TP
tania papasotiriou
the univercity of newcastle
KK
kyounghwan kim
kiria
DT
Damián J. Terrasa Díaz
Fhecor Ingenieros Consultores
HC
Hernan Castelli
NOOPS Soluciones
CEO
EC
Edna Castillo
Olimpia
Product Development Director
JK
Jungik Kim
Korea Land and Housing Corporation
General Manager in International Development Cooperation
SA
Shiza Ali
Vector Health
Consultant (Mid-level)
LM
Lukasz Mastalerz
Think Lodz
MG
Marco Gazzino
Enel
GG
Geraldine Geraldine
+Colonia
WC
Walter Cevallos
pernos
MW
Michael White
Siemens
Director of National Business Development, Smart Infrastructure, Building Design and Const, Americas
IM
Imam Maulana
BRD
Consultant
AM
Albert Mira
amec urbis
DP
Donatas Pocius
STUART ENERGY
MC
Maria Cederborg
The city of Stockholm
Project manager

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.