Can AI tools reduce infrastructure losses from disasters?
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Can AI tools reduce infrastructure losses from disasters?

My list

Author | Elvira Esparza

Natural disasters have caused annual losses of around 170 billion euros worldwide over the past 15 years, according to a Deloitte report. These losses will rise to 400 billion by 2050 because climate change is driving an increase in such disasters. Additionally, these catastrophes are expected to occur more frequently in the coming years.

However, with the use of AI tools, annual savings of 65 billion euros in direct costs from these disasters could be achieved by 2050. According to the AI for Infrastructure Resilience report, improvements in AI could push annual savings beyond 90 billion euros.

What risks affect infrastructure?


Natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, storms, and floods cause the most severe damage to infrastructure. It is estimated that only 25% of the losses from these disasters, exceeding 400 billion, are insured.

The rise in infrastructure losses from these events is largely due to the intensification of such phenomena in recent years. Climate-related disasters have increased by more than 80% over the past four decades, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Storms are particularly significant, accounting for most losses, along with extreme temperatures and wildfires.

How can AI help maintain infrastructure?

AI tools can enhance infrastructure resilience throughout its entire lifecycle, from planning and prevention to post-disaster recovery.

In the planning phase, AI-based predictive models help promote more appropriate land use by providing data on terrain elevation, soil saturation, and urban density. Digital twins also aid planning by enabling simulations of how natural disasters might affect infrastructure and helping prepare it to minimize negative impacts.

In the prevention phase, machine learning models are used because they process large volumes of data that help forecast disasters more accurately. They also enable early activation of alert systems to reduce the impact of disasters. One example of these models is a system developed by NASA using satellite data to predict wildfire ignition points, which helps firefighting teams take targeted measures to reduce fire risk.

In the recovery phase, AI tools speed up damage assessment and infrastructure repair by enabling predictive damage evaluations and more efficient resource allocation to minimize costs.

Challenges of using Artificial Intelligence

Despite the significant benefits of applying AI tools to infrastructure to mitigate the effects of natural disasters, there are challenges to their development. On one hand, there are financial limitations because implementation is costly, requiring large investments in hardware and software, as well as specialized personnel.

It also raises regulatory challenges regarding data privacy, as well as data quality, because if AI models are trained with inaccurate data, the results will be less effective.

The solution to improving infrastructure resilience and preventing losses from natural disasters lies in joint collaboration among financial institutions, insurers, engineering experts, legislators, and infrastructure operators. AI needs to be incorporated into infrastructure planning and design to enhance efficiency and strengthen resilience, secure funding through innovative financial instruments, and implement integrated solutions that combine AI with other complementary technologies.

Image | Imad Clicks

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

JS
Juan Carlos Sánchez Tappan
STUDIO OF ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH, SOFAR
Principal
AM
Adrian Moleavin
Moleavin Arhitectura
Senior Partner
RJ
Rudy Janssens
Agoria
PB
Pamela Bishop
Ascendax
AY
Alpes Yadav
SUBCON TECHNOLEGAL CONSULTANTS
Advisor
CC
Cayano Cougo
Stefanini
Service Designer responsible for developing new processes to improve the employee experience.
AA
Anneleen Artois
Microsoft
AM
Adriana Analía Moreno
Universidad Católica de Santiago del Estero
HE
Hazem El Batouti
MB
Manjunatha Beleri
WSP
Senior Engineer ICT & AV
MR
Miguel Ángel Ronquillo Monterrey
Zona / Zone. Architecture, City and Territory
Director
RR
Rodrigo Rojo
IE
NA
UT
Ulari Teder
EyeVi Technologies Ltd
Sales Director
AC
Ana Carranza
a | Ca Studio
Archictetc, Interior Designer and Teacher
VS
Vitor Silva
Cycloid
Business Development
BV
Bernard Vicens
EBV Elektronik
Director Segment Light, Home & Buildings
AN
ANTONIO NUNES
CAU/BR
DH
Dimitar Hristov
Cluster Sofia Knowledge City (CSKC)
Chair of the Board
LC
Larah Casadio
Student
Student, 4th year.
AA
Aamer Azeemi
Petrus Consulting LLC
Managing Consultant

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.