Is it possible to create quieter trams?
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Is it possible to create quieter trams?

My list

Author | Lucía Burbano

Despite being one of the most sustainable forms of transport, trams produce a bothersome squeaking noise when their metal wheels come into contact with the rails. This issue is significant enough to warrant serious consideration in urban planning. Although trams are eco-friendly in terms of emissions, they can be quite noisy. However, many cities are now implementing innovative techniques to reduce the acoustic pollution caused by their trams.

Are trams noisy?

As an urban mode of transport, trams offer numerous benefits. Among these benefits, trams improve environmental quality compared to diesel-fueled buses, achieving NOx savings of over 92% per passenger-kilometer.

Trams travel on rails and operate using electric traction. The power is obtained either from an overhead contact line or a catenary system. Although trams generate less noise than road vehicles, they are not entirely silent.

A study conducted in Nantes measured the noise levels of trams in two locations, recording maximum sound levels of 70 to 80 dB at a speed of 40 km/h. Another study, this time in Slovenia, recorded noise levels of 75 dB at speeds of 25 km/h.

The World Health Organization recommends that noise levels generated by rail traffic, which includes trams, should not exceed 54 dB during the day and 44 dB at night. Therefore, the noise levels produced by trams exceed the acoustic pollution thresholds recommended by the WHO.

Trams: causes of the noise

The noise generated by trams is caused by the friction between the wheel and the rail, leading to high-frequency oscillation. This issue is particularly pronounced around bends, as the tram axles are rigid, causing the inside of the exterior wheel to slip on the curve.

This sliding is rapidly alternated with adherence, a phenomenon known as the stick-slip effect, which causes the wheel to oscillate. During this process, the sound produced by the wheel is perceived as an irritating whistle.

Systems for reducing tram friction

Today, there are numerous options available to reduce the acoustic pollution caused by trams. Some measures are applied during the construction of the infrastructure, while others can be implemented later. All of these measures are outlined in the paper ‘State of the art about solutions for tram noise reduction in the framework of the Life SNEAK project’.

Shock absorbers for the rolling noise.

The purpose of shock absorbers is to reduce rail vibrations when the tram is in motion, thereby decreasing the noise it generates. They effectively mitigate both the whistling noise and the rolling noise.

Numerous studies have measured a noise reduction of up to 3-5 dB after the installation of shock absorbers.

Lubrication

One of the most effective mitigation systems that can be installed after manufacturing is the lubrication of the wheel/rail interface using friction modifiers. This solution reduces noise by allowing the wheel to slide along the rail more freely, thereby limiting the stick-slip effect.

Phono-absorbent railroad platforms

Phono-absorbent materials are installed along the base of the road and on all the horizontal surfaces adjacent to the railway line. The results have shown reductions in noise levels of up to 3-4 dB compared with conventional sound reflective pavements.

Cities that have reduced the volume of their trams

Gothenburg

The Swedish city has equipped 28 trams (out of a total of 200) with stationary lubrication systems, as well as onboard microphones and data collection systems to monitor noise levels. The system sends an alarm to the route operator if the established acoustic limits are exceeded. Since the installation of lubrication systems, the number of alarms has decreased by 80%.

Florence

The Tuscan capital has undertaken numerous initiatives for its trams, including the introduction of noise barriers, low-noise paving surfaces, and the replacement of windows to protect noise-sensitive passengers.

Photographs | Unsplash/Tapio Haaja, Unsplash/tam wai, Marek Rucinski

Related Content

Recommended profiles for you

SP
Stefano Persi
Mosaic Factor
CEO
AC
Alexandre Contar Fernandes
GoToThink / eSIMs
MA
Maryam Asgaripour
Municipality of Tehran district 12
I work in the development of active transportation, especially bicycles.
HP
Henry Patzig
FinEst Twins Center of Excellence
Deliverable manager
AT
Aristarco Tomás
Tenalach Consulting
CEO
AE
Antoni Erro Mas
Federació d'Associacions de veïns de Manresa
President de la Federació d'Associacions de Veïns de Manresa
CV
Carmen Valdez
GIZ
EB
Edwin Bijl
Riab / U4SSC
FOUNDER
SB
Sergi Bru
relevance
CEO
PG
Paul Grassl
Radboud University
Behavioural Science Researcher
AB
Arnau Blanch
Endesa X
B2G Marketing & Sales
AC
Alessandro Coda Coda
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles - CRF
Unit Responsible Collaboration Projects
CS
Cláudia Simões
Bosch
Engineer
EK
Elena Kuehnapfel
Dilax Intelcom GmbH
Sales Manager Nordics and UK
CL
Carlos Arturo Leon Acevedo
INTERSA
DB
David Bros
ESADE
MM
Monika Mizielińska-Chmielewska
Media Trend Monika Mizielińska-Chmielewska
Smart City and new technologies Expert
AO
Aleksander Orlowski
Gdansk University of Technology
Professor
KM
Kirsten Mote
Modern Mobility Partners
Director of Smart Mobility Planning
DJ
Diego Antonio Jiménez
Novatechjd sas
Director de proyectos

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.