Can AI tools reduce infrastructure losses from disasters?
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Can AI tools reduce infrastructure losses from disasters?

My list

Author | Elvira Esparza

Natural disasters have caused annual losses of around 170 billion euros worldwide over the past 15 years, according to a Deloitte report. These losses will rise to 400 billion by 2050 because climate change is driving an increase in such disasters. Additionally, these catastrophes are expected to occur more frequently in the coming years.

However, with the use of AI tools, annual savings of 65 billion euros in direct costs from these disasters could be achieved by 2050. According to the AI for Infrastructure Resilience report, improvements in AI could push annual savings beyond 90 billion euros.

What risks affect infrastructure?


Natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, storms, and floods cause the most severe damage to infrastructure. It is estimated that only 25% of the losses from these disasters, exceeding 400 billion, are insured.

The rise in infrastructure losses from these events is largely due to the intensification of such phenomena in recent years. Climate-related disasters have increased by more than 80% over the past four decades, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Storms are particularly significant, accounting for most losses, along with extreme temperatures and wildfires.

How can AI help maintain infrastructure?

AI tools can enhance infrastructure resilience throughout its entire lifecycle, from planning and prevention to post-disaster recovery.

In the planning phase, AI-based predictive models help promote more appropriate land use by providing data on terrain elevation, soil saturation, and urban density. Digital twins also aid planning by enabling simulations of how natural disasters might affect infrastructure and helping prepare it to minimize negative impacts.

In the prevention phase, machine learning models are used because they process large volumes of data that help forecast disasters more accurately. They also enable early activation of alert systems to reduce the impact of disasters. One example of these models is a system developed by NASA using satellite data to predict wildfire ignition points, which helps firefighting teams take targeted measures to reduce fire risk.

In the recovery phase, AI tools speed up damage assessment and infrastructure repair by enabling predictive damage evaluations and more efficient resource allocation to minimize costs.

Challenges of using Artificial Intelligence

Despite the significant benefits of applying AI tools to infrastructure to mitigate the effects of natural disasters, there are challenges to their development. On one hand, there are financial limitations because implementation is costly, requiring large investments in hardware and software, as well as specialized personnel.

It also raises regulatory challenges regarding data privacy, as well as data quality, because if AI models are trained with inaccurate data, the results will be less effective.

The solution to improving infrastructure resilience and preventing losses from natural disasters lies in joint collaboration among financial institutions, insurers, engineering experts, legislators, and infrastructure operators. AI needs to be incorporated into infrastructure planning and design to enhance efficiency and strengthen resilience, secure funding through innovative financial instruments, and implement integrated solutions that combine AI with other complementary technologies.

Image | Imad Clicks

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

ZH
Zacarias Omar Hernández
TIR Inmobiliarios S.C.
Partner
JV
João Victor Pinho da Silveira Vitao
Fortestecnogia
Fortestecnogia
FP
Filipe Pinto
Bentley Systems
Sales Engineer - Mobile Mapping & Reality Modelling
DK
Daniel Kakolewski
lookale
IC
inez chu
inversionesartech
project manager
JG
João Gonçalves
Polytechnic University of Coimbra
SS
Santiago Silva-Santisteban
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Final year student
CS
Chanyaphat Saneewong Na Ayutthaya
Bangkok Metropolitan Administration
Urban planning
SM
Stefan Merkle
Immobilien Zeitung
Specialized on digital transformation in real estate @ImmoZeitung / Germany
EF
Eugênio Felippetto
Particular
Assessor
JH
Jaime Horna
DIGITALMAX SAC
NN
Natasha Frides Natasha
Bappenas
Planner
SS
Sandra Sanagustin gomez
ajuntament de barcelona
KM
Kfir Maccabee
bezalel academy
ML
Mugi Laksono
CIKA SM
Senior Staff
OB
Oliver Busch
Scan&Eggs
UH
USMAN HARUNI
ATOZ SMART WORLD AND SMART LEARNING ACADEMY
MSME
AZ
Augusto Zavalaga Fernández
CONECTELL SRL
MG
Melina Greco Greco
Melina Greco Arquitetura
Sócia proprietária e projetista
LC
Lacroix Clement
Capgemini

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.