Can AI tools reduce infrastructure losses from disasters?
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Can AI tools reduce infrastructure losses from disasters?

My list

Author | Elvira Esparza

Natural disasters have caused annual losses of around 170 billion euros worldwide over the past 15 years, according to a Deloitte report. These losses will rise to 400 billion by 2050 because climate change is driving an increase in such disasters. Additionally, these catastrophes are expected to occur more frequently in the coming years.

However, with the use of AI tools, annual savings of 65 billion euros in direct costs from these disasters could be achieved by 2050. According to the AI for Infrastructure Resilience report, improvements in AI could push annual savings beyond 90 billion euros.

What risks affect infrastructure?


Natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, storms, and floods cause the most severe damage to infrastructure. It is estimated that only 25% of the losses from these disasters, exceeding 400 billion, are insured.

The rise in infrastructure losses from these events is largely due to the intensification of such phenomena in recent years. Climate-related disasters have increased by more than 80% over the past four decades, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Storms are particularly significant, accounting for most losses, along with extreme temperatures and wildfires.

How can AI help maintain infrastructure?

AI tools can enhance infrastructure resilience throughout its entire lifecycle, from planning and prevention to post-disaster recovery.

In the planning phase, AI-based predictive models help promote more appropriate land use by providing data on terrain elevation, soil saturation, and urban density. Digital twins also aid planning by enabling simulations of how natural disasters might affect infrastructure and helping prepare it to minimize negative impacts.

In the prevention phase, machine learning models are used because they process large volumes of data that help forecast disasters more accurately. They also enable early activation of alert systems to reduce the impact of disasters. One example of these models is a system developed by NASA using satellite data to predict wildfire ignition points, which helps firefighting teams take targeted measures to reduce fire risk.

In the recovery phase, AI tools speed up damage assessment and infrastructure repair by enabling predictive damage evaluations and more efficient resource allocation to minimize costs.

Challenges of using Artificial Intelligence

Despite the significant benefits of applying AI tools to infrastructure to mitigate the effects of natural disasters, there are challenges to their development. On one hand, there are financial limitations because implementation is costly, requiring large investments in hardware and software, as well as specialized personnel.

It also raises regulatory challenges regarding data privacy, as well as data quality, because if AI models are trained with inaccurate data, the results will be less effective.

The solution to improving infrastructure resilience and preventing losses from natural disasters lies in joint collaboration among financial institutions, insurers, engineering experts, legislators, and infrastructure operators. AI needs to be incorporated into infrastructure planning and design to enhance efficiency and strengthen resilience, secure funding through innovative financial instruments, and implement integrated solutions that combine AI with other complementary technologies.

Image | Imad Clicks

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

KM
Karen Munzenmayer
Flor de Barrio
CEO
AK
Ayub Khan
Karekar & Associates
Project Manager
AN
Arthur Nasciutti Prudente
Madrona Fialho Advogados
FD
Frehun Demissie
CLIC Ethiopia
CB
Charles Byers
Industrial Internet Consortium
Associate CTO
AR
Andrea Ragione
Somfy
Managing Director
PO
Petro Olenych
Land Resources Department
Head of Land Resources Department
YC
Yoojeong Choi
Chokwang Paint Ltd
Clerk/Global division
UT
Ulises Trejo Briseño
ITESHU
Student
RB
Roberto Bautista
Universidad de Guadalajara
PG
Pablo Gurevich
41graus
director
JG
João Garcia
Castro Group
AC
Alexandre Casas
Fama Systems
Business Manager
MG
Marcos Gonçalves
MG ArqLegal Consultant
Technology Development for Smart Cities Academic Studies and System technologies Salor.
AL
Adrian Lopez
Ineco
Comunication department
MG
Marco Goedhart
Newco communications
IT manager, design network
DD
Dimitar Dimitrov
Tu/e
SP
Susana Puerta
Urbe Legem SAS
LL
Larasati LTC
GDI
Volunteer
DG
Debasish Guha
Arcop Associates Private Limited

Are we building the cities we really need?

Explore Cartography of Our Urban Future —a bold rethink of ‘smart’ cities and what we must change by 2030.